Osteoporos Int 20:703–714PubMedCrossRef 3. Haentjens P, Magaziner J, Colon-Emeric CS et al (2010) Meta-analysis: excess mortality after hip fracture among older women and men. Ann Intern Med 152:380–390PubMed 4. Leslie WD, O’Donnell S, Jean S et al (2009) Trends in hip fracture rates in Canada. JAMA 302:883–889PubMedCrossRef 5. Wiktorowicz ME, Goeree R, Papaioannou A et al (2001) Economic implications of hip fracture: health service use, institutional care and cost in Canada. Osteoporos Int 12:271–278PubMedCrossRef 6. Leslie WD, Metge CJ, Azimaee M et al (2011) Direct costs of fractures in Canada and trends 1996-2006: a population-based cost-of-illness analysis.
J Bone Miner Res 26:2419–2429PubMedCrossRef 7. Bessette L, Jean S, Lapointe-Garant MP, et al. (2012) Direct medical costs attributable to peripheral fractures in Canadian check details post-menopausal women. Osteoporos Int 23:1757–1768 8. Jacobs P, Yim R (2009) Using Canadian administrative databases to derive economic data for health technology assessments. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), Ottawa 9. Juurlink D, Preyra C, Croxford R et al (2006) Canadian institute for health information discharge abstract database: a validation study. In ICES investigative report. Institute for
Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto 10. Ray WA, Griffin MR, Fought RL et al (1992) Identification of fractures from computerized medicare files. J Clin Epidemiol 45:703–714PubMedCrossRef Diflunisal 11. Williams JI, Young W (1996) Appendix 1: a summary of studies on the quality of health care administrative databases in Canada. find more In: Goel V, Williams JI, Anderson GM, Blackstein-Hirsch P, Fooks C, Naylor CD (eds) Patterns of health care in Ontario. The ICES Practice Atlas. Canadian Medical Association, Ottawa
12. The Johns Hopkins University (2011) John Hopkins ACG case-mix adjustment system. Available at http://www.acg.jhsph.edu. Accessed 21 Jan 2011 13. Kralj B (2000) Measuring “rurality” for purposes of health-care planning: an empirical measure for Ontario. Ont Med Rev 33-52 14. Austin PC (2011) Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat 10:150-161 15. Wodchis WP, Bushmeneva K, Nikitovic M et al (2012) Guidelines on person-level costing using administrative databases in Ontario. Health System Performance Research Network, Toronto 16. Pink GH, Bolley HB (1994) Physicians in health care management: 3. Case mix groups and resource intensity weights: an overview for physicians. CMAJ 150:889–894PubMed 17. Canadian Institute for Health Information (2004) Acute care grouping methodologies: from diagnosis related groups to case mix groups redevelopment 18. Canadian Institute for Health Information (2010) CCRS technical document—Ontario RUG PF477736 in vivo weighted patient day (RWPD) methodology. http://www.cihi.