For PA data, the time spent in sedentary activity, LPA and MVPA were converted to percentage of monitored time to account for the variance in the participants’ average monitoring time. This approach at analysis has been done in other recent PA studies.33 and 34 Change scores (post-test – baseline) were also computed for the percentage of time spent in each activity category. 2 × 2 univariate analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were done on the change scores using Group (CP, TD) and Training (FMS, control) as fixed factors. Age was used as a covariate because FMS are
known to develop during the pre-pubescent years.12 Paired comparisons with Bonferroni adjustments were performed to follow up significant main effects. Paired samples Carfilzomib in vivo t tests were performed to follow up significant interactions, and to compare the weekday and weekend PA of participants. Pearson’s product moment correlation was computed to examine the association between change in FMS scores and change in activity category. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 for all tests. The minimal detectable change (MDC) for time spent in the three PA categories was also computed for the training groups (CP-FMS, TD-FMS) to verify that click here observed changes were not due to uncontrolled error. The MDC90 was computed based on the standard error of measurement (SEM) and the confidence interval (90%CI) of the mean changes in scores.35 The proportion of participants in the training groups who
achieved the MDC90 was then calculated. It was first verified that FMS proficiency had improved for participants in the training groups. Based on the analyses of change scores, participants in the FMS training groups appeared to have gained improvements in the quality of movement patterns and outcomes, as reported in detail below. A significant main
effect of Training was found on the change in scores of all five tested FMS: running (F(4, 49) = 8.407, p = 0.006, ç2 = 0.239), jumping (F(4, 49) = 20.357, p < 0.001, ç2 = 0.311), kicking (F(4, 49) = 16.207, p < 0.001, ç2 = 0.265), throwing (F(4, 49) = 10.798, p = 0.002, ç2 = 0.194), and catching (F(4, 49) = 8.407, p < 0.006, ç2 = 0.239). Pairwise comparisons showed that training groups had a significantly larger positive change in scores than the control groups (all p < 0.01). Age was also found to be a significant covariate of the change in three skills: jumping (F(4, Dichloromethane dehalogenase 49) = 12.291, p = 0.001, ç2 = 0.215), throwing (F(4, 49) = 15.86, p < 0.0001, ç2 = 0.261), and catching (F(4, 49) = 7.919, p = 0.007, ç2 = 0.150). No significant main effect of Group was found for any process-oriented FMS score. No significant Group × Training interactions were found either. Significant main effects of Training were found on the change in scores for all five tested skills: running duration (F(4, 49) = 7.86, p = 0.008, ç2 = 0.155), jumping distance (F(4, 49) = 14.03, p = 0.001, ç2 = 0.238), successful kick (F(4, 49) = 24.79, p < 0.001, ç2 = 0.