What was

the basis for this obsession?   Benson: (laughs)

What was

the basis for this obsession?   Benson: (laughs) I never worried about it.   Buchanan: (laughs)   Benson: But that’s what he—He thought there should be a cycle, so NVP-BSK805 nmr the product would be reconvertible to the acceptor again.   Buchanan: So that turned out to be correct.   Benson: Yeah.   Buchanan: It was a cycle. Because at the time, for many years, it was thought that carbon dioxide was converted directly to a reduced form of carbon—   Benson: Yeah.   Buchanan: Warburg’s hypothesis.   Benson: Yeah.   Buchanan: But the cycle showed that this was not correct, by any means. So Calvin did—a main contribution was the concept of the cycle.   Benson: So anytime you’ve got a compound that reacts with carbon dioxide, enzymatically, and it splits in half to make two C–3 pieces—which are exactly the same as the first product that you observe giving a plant carbon dioxide.   Buchanan: And so this product was 3–phosphoglyceric acid. And it had been observed for many years. But it was not known how it was formed until you found ribulose 1,5-diphosphate.   Benson: Yeah, yeah. That’s right.   Buchanan: Calvin didn’t recognize that the ribulose-1, 5-diphosphate made the whole cycle.   Benson: No, I don’t think he realized that for a long time.   Buchanan: Even though—I think you said—he had “cyclitis.”   Benson: Yeah.   Buchanan: He somehow didn’t recognize this. Which check details members of selleckchem the photosynthesis research group at Berkeley

made the most important contributions in elucidating Reverse transcriptase the carbon cycle besides you and

Calvin?   Benson: Oh, Al Bassham, by a long shot. He wrote a great many papers on the various reactions and interactions which occurred. And they were good papers but not novel.   The thioctic acid theory Buchanan: Not novel. The next area is a very interesting one, I think, the thioctic acid theory. At one point, Calvin visualized that a recently discovered coenzyme, thioctic acid or lipoic acid, could explain photosynthesis. Thioctic acid in its oxidized state has a disulfide bond.   Benson: Yeah.   Buchanan: Calvin predicted that, in the splitting of water in photosynthesis, hydrogen would be used to reduce one sulfur atom and the other sulfur atom would be oxidized to the –SOH state.   Benson: Yes, that’s right.   Buchanan: And then the reduced sulfur atom would give rise to reduced pyridine nucleotides and the oxidized sulfur atom would give rise to oxygen. But many people in his laboratory tried to prove this theory. I think Clint Fuller was one of the ones. But you worked on it, as well. What was your conclusion after—?   Benson: My conclusion was that it’s impossible. Because I added radioactive sulfur to the system and it gave one product, which we called a sulfolipid.   Buchanan: But so this influenced your later work in which you discovered sulfur lipids.   Benson: Yeah.   Buchanan: But Calvin was really enamored with the theory and spoke about it widely, in his usual persuasive style, I assume.

Comments are closed.