The importance of type I IFN and TLR-7 signalling in aggravating

The importance of type I IFN and TLR-7 signalling in aggravating kidney injury was established in mice that overexpress TLR-7 (Y-linked autoimmune accelerating locus mice – Yaa mice) or that were treated with pristane.[93-95] In a pristane-induced mouse model of SLE, it was shown that an intact type I IFN signalling pathway is prerequisite to the upregulation of TLR-7 receptors in B cells and effective activation through TLR-7 and TLR-9 of B cells to produce lupus-specific autoantibodies.[96]

These findings suggested that type I IFN is upstream selleck chemicals llc of TLR signalling in the activation of autoreactive B cells in SLE. Furthermore, in lupus-prone mice, severe nephritis can be induced by the activation of TLR-9 signalling pathway through CpG-rich DNA.[97] These observations were supported Wnt cancer by a study that tested a dual inhibitor of TLR-7 and TLR-9 (known to inhibit IFN-α production by PDC) in lupus-prone mice. The inhibition of TLR-7 and TLR-9 would lead to a significant improvement of proteinuria, glomerulonephritis, and survival as well as decreased nucleic acid-specific autoantibodies.[98] Elevation of type I IFN in lupus patients was one of the first described

cytokine abnormalities in autoimmune diseases. The link between IFN levels and disease activity, anti-dsDNA levels and clinical manifestations backs the role of IFN in SLE pathogenesis.[99] In lupus patients, PDC was detected in the dermal lesions and are responsible for sustained IFN release, although their circulating number is lower in the peripheral blood.[100] Migration of PDC to the glomeruli is observed in patients with lupus nephritis and this movement Erastin in vitro is thought to be influenced by IL-18.[101] In patients with cerebral lupus, autoantibodies with the capacity to form very potent interferonogenic immune complexes together with RNA-containing auto-antigens were detected in the cerebrospinal fluid.[102] Gene expression profiling showed that SLE patients expressed IFN-inducible genes in PBMC and the expression correlated

with disease activities.[78] These findings revealed that raised IFN levels are capable of altering gene expression in active lupus patients and supported the pathogenic role of type I IFN in human lupus. Data derived by the genetic studies had further delineated the causal role of IFN in SLE. Transcription factor IRF5 was the first identified gene directly involved in IFN production and was associated with heightened risk of SLE.[103] Lupus patients with a risk haplotype of IRF5 showed more intense serum IFN activity when compared with patients lacking this risk genotype and the effect was most obvious in patients with autoantibodies against either RNA-binding proteins or double-stranded DNA.[104] Another example is the signal transducer and activator of transcription 4 (STAT4) which interacts with the cytoplasmic part of the IFNAR and variants of STAT4 have been shown to be strongly associated with lupus.

Comments are closed.