v. 24 and 36 h before administration of Con A. To deplete Treg cells, 300 μg of anti-CD25 (PC61) was injected i.p. 16 and 40 h before Con A injection. The liver MNCs were isolated as described previously

[41]. Briefly, cells in supernatants were resuspended in 40% Percoll (GE healthcare), overlaid on 70% Percoll and centrifuged for 30 min at 750 × g. Cells in interphase were collected and washed. Adhesive cells in liver were isolated with collagenase solution as described previously [30]. APO866 The liver MNCs (3.5 × 105 cells) and the DN32.D3 hybridoma cells (5 × 104 cells, provided by Dr. Albert Bendelac, the University of Chicago, USA) were incubated with Con A (5 μg/mL) or α-GalCer (200 ng/mL) for 24 h in the presence of 100 nM ATRA. The supernatants were collected for ELISA. For the antagonist assay, chemicals were used at a concentration of 4 μM, and ATRA was used at a concentration of 10 nM. The levels of IFN-γ, IL-4, and TNF-α in serum or supernatants were evaluated with ELISA kits in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (BD Biosciences). Con A-stimulated DN32.D3 hybridoma cells in the presence of vehicle (DMSO)

or ATRA were lysed with Triton lysis buffer. SDS-PAGE was performed on 8% polyacrylamide gels, and then proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes. Following blocking using 5% BSA buffer, the blots were incubated in the presence of primary Abs specific for pERK, ERK, pJNK, JNK, phospho-p38 MAPK, p38 MAPK, IκB (Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), Veliparib mw and GAPDH (Abcam, Cambridge, Orotic acid UK), followed by HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG. The membrane was developed using WEST-one reagent (iNtRON Biotechnology, Gyeonggi-do, Korea) and detected on

an X-ray film. The membrane was stripped and reblotted. Total RNA was extracted from cells using RNeasy kit (Qiagen) and reverse transcribed into cDNA using oligo-dT primers and MMLV reverse transcriptase (Roche). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using an ABI 7500 (Applied Biosystems) and SYBR green PCR MasterMix (Fermentas). Primer sequences were as follows: for Hprt, 5′-AAGACTTGCTCGAGATGTCATGAA-3′ (forward) and 5′-ATCCAGCAGGTCAGCAAAGAA-3′ (reverse); for IFN-γ, 5′-AACCCACAGGTCCAGCGCCA-3′ (forward) and 5′-CACCCCGAATCAGCAGCGACT-3′ (reverse); for IL-4, 5′-GGGCTTCACAGGTGCTTCGC-3′ (forward) and 5′-TCCAGGACATCGAAAAGCCCGA-3′ (reverse); for TNF-α, 5′-GCCAGCCGATGGGTTGTACC-3′ (forward) and 5′-CTTGGGGCAGGGGCTCTTGA-3′ (reverse). The reaction conditions were 10 min at 95°C, followed by 15 s at 95°C, 30 s at 57°C and 30 s at 72°C for 45 cycles, and 30 min at 72°C. The comparative Ct method for relative quantification was used, and all of the expression levels of the target genes were normalized to the expression of Hprt. The results are expressed as the mean values ± SD. To compare the differences between two groups, Student’s t-test was used. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to analyze the statistical significance of differences in survival time.