This still begs the question of precisely how IL-23 fits in the Th17 model. Naive T cells do not express the IL-23 receptor (IL-23R); however, when exposed to IL-6, IL-23R expression is up-regulated in a STAT3-dependent manner.[49] Over-expression of a hyperactive variant of STAT3 potentiated T-cell production of IL-17

and increased expression of Th17-associated genes, such as IL-23 and RORγt. Conversely, conditional knockout of STAT3 abolished Th17 differentiation, providing a partial explanation as to why IL-23 itself, in the absence of IL-6 or STAT3 signalling, did not have biological activity on Th17. Gene expression analysis of naive T cells stimulated learn more with Th17 polarizing cytokines found that IL-21 and IL-23R were highly up-regulated in response to IL-6.[50] Forced expression of IL-23R overcame the requirement for IL-6 in Th17 polarization, though this still depended upon activation of RORγt, the expression

of which is inducible via IL-23/IL-23R signalling. Curiously, signalling through IL-21/IL-21R could also replace IL-6 in polarizing assays, suggesting that IL-6 functions as an upstream signal to IL-21. The IL-21-mediated Th17 induction also depended on STAT3 activation. Although in vitro studies using IL-21R−/− cells exhibited KU-60019 an inhibition to induce IL-17 production in response to IL-6 and TGF-β, however, clear defects in Th17 induction were not observed in vivo in IL-21R−/− mice. Collectively, these data indicate that IL-6 functions

as an instructive cue to induce www.selleck.co.jp/products/atezolizumab.html T-cell expression of IL-21, which both signals through STAT3 and increases its expression. This leads to feed-forward STAT3 activation and sensitization of cells to IL-23 by promoting expression of IL-23R. The TGF-β and IL-6 signals induce expression of RORγt, which in combination with STAT3, synergistically drives the Th17 programme. The requirement for TGF-β in programming Th17 is intriguing because TGF-β can also induce Treg cell development.[51] The decision between Treg and Th17 appears to be dictated by levels of TGF-β and IL-6:[44, 52] IL-6 signalling can block Treg cell differentiation, presumably through STAT3 activation. Since S1P1 signalling may activate STAT3[39] in tumour cells, it would be interesting to know if cells from S1P1 over-expressing transgenic animals, particularly T cells, have enhanced STAT3 activation. One hypothesis for how S1P1 inhibits Treg cell development is interference with the TGF-β signalling pathway.[53] The TGF-β signalling can induce the expression of both the RORγt (Th17-driving) and Foxp3 (Treg-driving) transcription factors, and these factors can be co-expressed.[52] There is cross-talk between the two programmes, as Foxp3 is known to inhibit RORγt function and hence Th17 differentiation. If the S1P1 transgenic animals used by Liu et al.