In a previous study (Li et al., 2009) we identified one hiC6 gene in each of the two C. vulgaris strains by PCR. In this study, we performed Selleckchem Panobinostat a more extensive PCR screening of the cosmid libraries of both strains and obtained the hiC6-containing cosmids for each strain. A physical map of a NJ-7 cosmid was constructed, and the restriction fragments containing hiC6 were identified by PCR. A 13 503-bp region of the cosmid was sequenced, in which five tandem-arrayed hiC6 genes were identified. Figure 1a shows the structure of the NJ-7 cosmid. The structure of the tandem array of hiC6 genes was confirmed by a series of PCR detections of chromosomal DNA using gene-specific primers (data not shown). The physical map of

an UTEX259 cosmid was also constructed, and an 8210-bp region of the cosmid was sequenced, in which four tandem-arrayed hiC6 genes were identified. Figure 1b shows the structure of the UTEX259 cosmid. The hiC6 genes in NJ-7 are designated as NJ7hiC6-1, -2, -3, -4 and -5, and those in UTEX259 as 259hiC6-1, -2, -3 and -4. Each hiC6 gene in the two strains possesses four exons and

three introns. The alignments of cDNAs of five NJ7hiC6 genes and four 259hiC6 genes are shown in Fig. 2a and b. NJ7hiC6-3 and -4 are identical to each other, whereas all other hiC6 genes have 2–19 bp that differ from each other. NJ7hiC6-3, -4 and -5 encode identical HIC6 protein, whereas other copies in the two strains are predicted to

encode HIC6 isoforms of 1–10 amino acid substitutions (Fig. 2c). Introns show higher degrees of divergence between the hiC6 genes Microtubule Associated inhibitor compared with exons. As shown in Table S2, in both strains, the intron sequences of hiC6-1 (NJ7hiC6-1, 259hiC6-1) as a whole are 84–89% identical to those of other hiC6 genes, whereas the other sequences are 97–99% identical compared to each other. Apparently, NJ7hiC6-1 and 259hiC6-1 are more distantly related to other hiC6 genes in phylogeny. To find out whether there was only one tandem array of hiC6 genes in each strain, we performed Southern blot hybridizations. Restriction enzymes were chosen according to their sequences. As shown in Fig. 3, there was only one region of hiC6 genes in the genome of NJ-7 or UTEX259. Due to the presence of an NheI site in SPTLC1 the tandem array, digestion of NJ-7 genomic DNA with NheI +DraI resulted in two hybridization bands, whereas digestion with other restriction enzymes all resulted in a single band. In a previous report (Li et al., 2009), we showed that the transcription of hiC6 was increased in NJ-7 and UTEX259 after transfer from 20 to 4 °C, and that at 20 °C, hiC6 was expressed at a much higher level in NJ-7 than in UTEX259. In this study, we further examined the abundance of total hiC6 transcripts at different time points after transfer to the low temperature. Consistently, at 20 °C, NJ7hiC6 genes showed much stronger expression than 259hiC6 genes.