All sampling sites showed intermediate values of heterozygosity and H O and H E per site ranged from 0.547 to 0.598 and from 0.552 to 0.630 respectively, and both values were lower than in ranch mink (H O = 0.679 and H E = 0.692; Table 1). All sampling sites demonstrated non-significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg expectations after Bonferroni correction. Lack of genetic differentiation of feral mink among sites and high differentiation

between feral and ranch mink was suggested by pairwise F ST and D est values (Table 3). The F ST values ranged from 0.002 to 0.051 and most values did not differ significantly after sequential Bonferroni correction, suggesting a lack of significant differentiation selleck kinase inhibitor among sites. Exceptions were the site pairs Artibai-Butron and Artibai-Urdaibai in which F ST values were statistically significant, selleck screening library suggesting that some restriction in gene flow occurs between them. The greatest levels of differentiation were observed between feral and ranch mink and the differentiation increased with distance of the site from the farm (Table 3). Similar results were obtained using the harmonic mean D est index which was low between mink trapping

sites (ranging from 0.0001 to 0.05) but very high between mink from trapping sites and mink from the farm (ranging between 0.08 and 0.20; Table 3). Table 3 Pairwise F ST estimates (above diagonal) 3-oxoacyl-(acyl-carrier-protein) reductase and harmonic mean estimates D est across loci (below diagonal) among American mink samples taken from five river catchments and one farm (ranch) in N Spain Sampling site Ibaizabal Butron Urdaibai Lea Artibai Ranch Ibaizabal – 0.0019 0.0077 0.0119 0.0350 0.1290 Butron 0.0001 – 0.0082 0.0220 0.0452 0.1472 Urdaibai 0.0013 0.0016 – 0.0038

0.0511 0.1308 Lea 0.0013 0.0089 0.0007 – 0.0420 0.0900 Artibai 0.0114 0.0290 0.0518 0.0187 – 0.0821 Ranch 0.1706 0.2012 0.1869 0.1322 0.0797 – Bold Ulixertinib indicated P < 0.05 The Bayesian model-based clustering analysis implemented in STRUCTURE indicated the presence of two genetic clusters in this sample of American mink. Although the K = 2 model did not have the absolute maximal posterior probability (Ln P(D)) value, this model was supported by the highest ΔK value (267) where the ΔK value for K between 3 and 6 ranged from 0.2 to 25. This analysis, implying the likely presence of two genetically distinct groups and the assignment of individuals to populations for K = 2, is presented in Fig. 3. The individuals caught at the five sampling sites were assigned to one cluster and all individuals from the farm were assigned to the other cluster (Fig. 3). The feral and ranch mink had very high average membership values (q) ranging from 80 to 99 % for the feral cluster and 99 % for the ranch cluster.