A study conducted with murine splenic B cells showed an association between IRE1-dependent induction of XBP-1s and increased levels of the GRP78 and GRP94 mRNAs during terminal differentiation of B cells [53]. The chaperone BiP mediates one proposed

model of regulation of the UPR pathway. Under non-stressful conditions, BiP remains bound to the luminal domains of IRE1, PERK, and ATF6, functioning as a negative regulator [54]. Early experiments showed that IRE1 interacts with BiP in resting cells, from which it dissociates during ER stress [55]. A second model proposes that unfolded/misfolded proteins bind to the luminal learn more domain of IRE1, promoting its dimerization and activation of cytoplasmic effectors domains [56]. Finally, a third model integrates the previous models suggesting that dissociation of BiP from IRE1 triggers its oligomerization, HKI272 followed by binding of misfolded/unfolded proteins to sub-regions II and IV (core stress-sensing region, CSSR) of IRE1 luminal domain. The CSSR would then activate the effectors functions of IRE1. The ability of CSSR to inhibit aggregation of denaturated proteins

in vitro led to the observation of its ability to bind unfolded proteins [56]. More recently, a study showed that HSP72, a member of the HSP70 family whose expression is triggered by ER stress, might regulate the UPR pathway. The study showed that physical interaction between the kinase domain of IRE1 with the ATPase domain from HSP72 causes a delay in the termination of IRE1 endonuclease functions (XBP-1 splicing), enhancing the signalling by the IRE1/XBP-1 axis, which ultimately results in cytoprotection [57]. Viruses appear to regulate the UPR in order to benefit from it, but at the same time, inhibit those Amylase aspects that are detrimental to the regulation of

viral replication. PERK is activated in cells infected with herpes virus, while eIF2α remains dephosphorylated, so that viral protein synthesis is undisturbed [58]. In the early stages of cytomegalovirus infection, PERK is not phosphorylated, but as infection progresses, a slight increase in PERK phosphorylation is observed, along with phosphorylation of eIF2α. Still, there is no attenuation of protein translation. A significant increase of the ATF4 mRNA levels is also observed. ATF4 is responsible for transcription activation of several genes related to cellular metabolism. Altogether, these effects of cytomegalovirus appear to be important for maintenance of viral infection [59]. The earlier evidences of intersection between the UPR pathway and the inflammatory response were found in studies that showed a connection between ER stress and activation of the transcription factor NF-κB and the kinase stress-activated protein kinase/c-Jun-terminal kinase (SAPK/JNK) [60–63].