Indeed, it remains surprising that amitriptyline is still commonly prescribed in the USA, apparently in preference to nortriptyline or desipramine, and to trazodone and several newer alternatives. Nortriptyline has been the most frequently directly studied TCA in elderly patients, involving 300 or more

patients in 22 clinical trials.2,4 It is the only antidepressant to have been directly and extensively studied in very elderly patients (>80 year olds).2 Results with nortriptyline suggest that the range of plasma concentrations needed for a therapeutic this website effect is the same in both younger and older patients. However, despite treating patients at plasma levels within a presumed Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical therapeutic “window” (between 50 and 150 ng/mL), significant residual depressive symptoms have been noted in one half of patients in the clinical trials, and specific dosage recommendations cannot be derived from these studies.5 Clinical practice suggests that effective daily doses in the elderly range from 50 mg to 100

Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical mg, but this should be taken as a guide at best. There is considerable evidence that clinical response to antidepressant drug therapy depends not only on adequate dose and – in the case of TCAs – blood levels of medication, but adequate length of treatment as well. There is a general Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical consensus that significant response often occurs later in elderly patients than in younger patients, often after 6 to 12 weeks of therapy. Medication compliance with TCAs by elderly patients is especially important and difficult to achieve. It has been estimated that 70% of patients fail to take 25% to 50% of their medication.6 Lack of adherence to instructions results in wide fluctuations in plasma levels, which has been shown to be predictive of poor Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical outcome. Thus, the measurement of plasma blood levels in elderly patients is even more important than in younger patients, both to verify compliance and to confirm that therapeutic drug concentrations have been reached while remaining below toxic levels. Antidepressant

treatment in the 1990s Many treatment recommendations emanate from the 1991 NIH Consensus Development Conference7,8 and from the 1993 AHCPR guidelines.9 At that time, the SSRI fluoxetine had been available for only a few years, and sertraline and paroxetine had not yet been released. Many clinicians favored these medications ADAMTS5 because of the decreased likelihood of anticholinergic and cardiovascular side effects. Two other SSRIs have been introduced in the USA since then, fluvoxamine in 1996, and citalopram, at the end of 1998. (Fluvoxamine is indicated only for obsessive compulsive disorders in the US, although it is indicated for depression in other parts of the world.) In addition, three non-SSRIs, all with complex neurotransmitter actions, have recently been marketed, nefazodone and venlafaxine, as well as a noradrenergic medication, mirtazapine.