27 ± 0.44 1.10 ± 0.27 n.s. Total bilirubin (mg/dl) 1.44 ± 0.46 1.27 ± 0.47 n.s. Hemodialysis (Y/N) 2/37 4/7 0.017 ECMO use (Y/N) 0/39 2/9 0.045 DCL wound open care (Y/N) 21/18 7/4 n.s. Duration of laparotomy wound opened (days) 2.03 ± 2.91 1.11 ± 1.70 n.s Accumulated blood Trichostatin A Transfusion (U) 19.6 ± 4.16 32.9 ± 10.9 0.014 SD, Standard deviation; APACHI II, Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; PaO2, Arterial oxygen tension; FiO2, Fraction of inspiration oxygen; WBC, White cell count; Hb, Hemoglobin; PLT, Platelet; INR, International

normalized ratio, for prothrombin time; ECMO, Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; DCL, Damage control laparotomy. Multivariable analysis Factors that were significant https://www.selleckchem.com/products/epz004777.html in abovementioned analyses were further enrolled for multivariable analysis. However, no significant variables were identified during further logistic regression analysis. Even when we enrolled only factors with p < 0.01, no factor remained statistically and independently significant. Discussion DCL is a life-saving procedure. When this procedure is indicated, patients usually

do not have any other choice for their treatment. The basic rationale of DCL is for hemorrhage and contamination control at the early, life-threatening period. After the DCL, the clinicians then return patients to relatively stable conditions, so the patients can undergo definitive surgical treatment at the next stage. Even with the development of new strategies to manage and

resuscitate patients with severe trauma [8, 9] and the lack of high level supporting evidence [10], DCL still plays an important role in trauma care, even though some clinicians have reflected on its Amrubicin futility [11, 12]. Although DCL can bridge a patient with exsanguination from a devastating condition to a stage for definitive treatment, some patients still succumb to their critical condition even after successful hemostasis. In this study, we explored the factors that influenced patients’ outcomes after initially successful hemostasis. Our analysis included 3 different parts: demographic data and clinical MI-503 nmr conditions upon arrival at the ED, perioperative conditions, and early ICU parameters and intervention. In the univariable analysis, most of the significant factors were noted in the initial ED stage and the early ICU stage, while an analysis of perioperative factors revealed minimal survival impact. Initial hypoperfusion (pH, BE, and GCS level) and initial poor physiological conditions (body temperature, RTS, and CPCR at ED) may contribute to a patient’s final outcome. These factors are similar to the risk factors that were proposed by previous studies [13, 14], while RTS itself has served as a surrogate for survival prediction [15, 16]. The parameters recorded during the initial ICU admission represent the clinical conditions immediately after DCL.