“1 Confirming the impacts of invasive plants is essential


“1. Confirming the impacts of invasive plants is essential

for prioritizing management efforts, but is challenging, especially if Napabucasin impacts occur below-ground and over long periods as hypothesized for woodland shrub invasions. 2. For this reason, we developed a novel ‘paired-point’ framework capable of detecting the below-ground impacts of slow-growing invasive plants from short-term data sets in an investigation into the below-ground consequences of European buckthorn Rhamnus cathartica L. (hereafter buckthorn) invasions into Chicago-area woodlands. We measured differences between the members of 97 pairs of buckthorn-invaded and buckthorn-free points in 10 below-ground response variables (RVs) that buckthorn is hypothesized to alter (listed below). We then modelled these differences

(Delta RVs) in response to the severity of the invasion found at each invaded point. A relationship (linear or nonlinear) between a Delta RV and severity, that is slope not equal 0, suggests a buckthorn-induced change. BIX-01294 An intercept (value of Delta RV where severity = 0) different from zero suggests a pre-existing difference. 3. Relating differences to an invasion gradient rather than simply noting their presence provided evidence that the higher levels of moisture, pH, total C, total N, NH4+ – N and Ca2+ in invaded soils pre-date and possibly promote invasion (particularly Ca2+) and that neither earthworm biomass nor soil C : N ratios are associated with buckthorn invasion, all of which suggest buckthorn to be less of a ‘driver’ of below-ground change than hypothesized. We did, however, find evidence that buckthorn establishes in areas having greater leaf litter mass and higher rates of decomposition, and then proceeds to accelerate decomposition further and to alter spring soil NO3 – N levels. 4. Synthesis and applications. Our findings suggest that decisions regarding regional buckthorn management should be less driven by concerns about buckthorn’s below-ground impacts and that greater

consideration of how variation in below-ground CX-6258 factors relates to invader establishment is needed, rather than simply assuming this variation to be invader-induced. This latter consideration can help to design better targeted monitoring programmes, limiting the further spread of woodland invaders. These insights illustrate the utility of the paired-point framework both for investigating below-ground causes and consequences of slow-growing invasive plants and for guiding the management of these invasions.”
“Breast cancer stem cells (CSCs) are thought to drive recurrence and metastasis. Their identity has been linked to the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) but remains highly controversial since-depending on the cell-line studied-either epithelial (E) or mesenchymal (M) markers, alone or together have been associated with stemness.

Comments are closed.