The purposive sampling

of more non-White participants was

The purposive sampling

of more non-White participants was employed, since the inclusion of ethnic minorities has been a limitation of previous studies to investigate the public’s views about community pharmacy. However, these initial findings are useful to form the basis for further qualitative (until saturation is reached) and quantitative research to establish the extent to which the general population of the UK are in support of patient registration and to identify barriers to its implementation in the future. 1. South Wales Cardiac Network. 2013. MAPK Inhibitor Library New Choose Pharmacy Scheme [online]. http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sirplus/986/news/29092.pdf (Accessed 5/4/14). 2. Wilson H and Barber N. 2013. Review of NHS Pharmaceutical Care of Patients in the Community in Scotland [online]. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/0043/00430209.pdf (Accessed 4/4/13). E. Grey, H. Family, J. Sutton, M. Weiss University of Bath, Bath, UK This study explored community pharmacists’ (CPs), general practitioners’ (GPs) and practice nurses’(PNs) perceptions of teamwork to better understand what might improve CP integration into the primary care team Seventy-eight per cent of CPs considered themselves part of a multidisciplinary healthcare team (MDT), however nearly half of GPs and PNs did not include a

CP on their team GPs and PNs need to be made aware of the CP role and benefits they bring to care teams while CPs need to be more aware of the importance GPs and PNs place on face-to-face communication. The recent report on future models of care for pharmacy1 highlighted that, community pharmacy has not been fully integrated Selleckchem Venetoclax into primary care

teams. Phloretin This may be because other health care professionals (HCPs) do not fully understand the role of the CP.1 Better integration of CPs with other HCPs on clinical teams is seen as important for enabling the extension of the pharmacist’s role and may improve patient care.2 This study aimed to explore CPs’, GPs’ and PNs’ perceptions of teamwork in order to better understand what might improve CP integration. A survey of CPs, GPs and PNs in southwest England. Closed- and open-ended questions were developed from a pilot study with pharmacists. Respondents were asked whether they considered themselves part of a MDT, then about their MDTs or whether they would like to be part of a MDT. Benefits and barriers to multidisciplinary work were also explored. The survey was available online or in paper format. Recruitment was through primary care research networks, professional journals and networks, Twitter and direct contact with practices/pharmacies. Data were entered into SPSS for statistical analysis; content analysis was used with free text responses. Ethical approval was granted by University. One hundred sixty-two CPs, 214 GPs and 147 PNs responded; response rates could not be calculated we did not know how many viewed study advertisements or social media.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>