The potential recyclability of CNT-containing plastic parts is not as straightforward as other plastics not containing carbon nanomaterials. All CNT-containing plastic parts are black in color. With present recycling technology, it is not possible for plastic recyclers to separate different

types of black plastics by plastic type. This inability to differentiate between black plastics creates a “down-cycling” or no recycle option where all black plastics are grouped together into one batch and shredded to create post-consumer black plastics, potentially diluting the beneficial mechanical and electromagnetic properties of the material. It would also expand, albeit diluted, Z-VAD-FMK in vitro the number of post-consumer products containing nanomaterials. Depending on the products, occupational or consumer exposure is possible. With the advances in technology, it may be possible to design a “trigger” material into the manufacture of CNT products that can be used to separate CNT-containing black plastics from non-CNT products. This would allow the segregation of these plastics

for potential “up-cycling” opportunities. The other option to fully benefit from the recycling of CNT-containing materials is the implementation of a post-consumer “take-back” program. A “take-back” program Duvelisib cost may be feasible for higher end products such as electronics, automotive, aerospace and solar receivers but would not be feasible for the toy and packaging market sectors. The lower end markets would likely end up in a landfill or be incinerated thus generating another environmental exposure

scenario to include release due to UV exposure, in stormwater and/or burn. If these releases do occur, then the environment transport of these releases would need to be studied. At the end of the life of a product it is either recycled or thrown away. Depending on the country and Elongation factor 2 kinase region, if thrown away, the waste is either incinerated or landfilled. So far only one study has been published that investigated the behavior of nanoparticles during full-scale waste incineration (Walser et al., 2012). Because this work used CeO2 which does not undergo any changes during the incineration process the results from this study cannot be used to make conclusions about CNT-composites. Release of CNTs during waste incineration was modeled by Gottschalk et al., 2009 and Gottschalk et al., 2010. These authors suggested that in Switzerland the majority of all CNTs will end up in waste incineration. Of the total flow of 0.8–2.7 t/a CNTs that was predicted to reach the waste incineration plants of Switzerland, 0.5–1.8 t/a was modeled to be eliminated, the remaining fraction was attributed to filter ash (0.1–0.4 t/a) and slag (0.16–0.55 t/a), which were either exported or landfilled. The first data about incineration of CNT-composites are available.