g., Loutre and Berger, 2003, de Abreu et al., 2005 and Tzedakis, 2010). However, irrespective of atmospheric CO2 values, this is likely to be an inappropriate analogue because it does selleck products not consider other very significant

anthropogenic forcings on the carbon cycle, nitrogen cycle, atmospheric methane, land use change and alteration of the hydrological cycle, which were not present during MIS 11 but which are very important in the Anthropocene (e.g. Rockström et al., 2009). Studies of Earth’s climate ‘tipping points’ show that nonlinear forcing–response climatic behaviour, leading to state-shifts in many or all of Earth’s systems, can take place under a number of types of forcings, including the biosphere, thermohaline circulation and continental deglaciation (Lenton et al., 2008). It may be that accelerated deglaciation of Greenland

and the west Antarctic see more ice sheet, as result of Anthropocene warming and sea-level rise, will have similar impacts on global thermohaline circulation as deglaciations of the geologic past. However, changes in land surface hydrology and land use may result in a range of unanticipated environmental outcomes that have little or no geologic precedence (e.g. Lenton, 2013). Based on these significant differences between the Anthropocene and the geologic past, we argue that monitoring and modelling climate and environmental change in the Anthropocene requires a new kind of ‘post-normal science’ that cannot lean uncritically on our knowledge of the geological past (e.g., Funtowicz and Ravetz, 1993 and Funtowicz and Ravetz, 1994). In terms of Earth system dynamics, the Anthropocene can be best considered as a singularity in which its constituent Earth systems are increasingly exhibiting uncertainty in the ways in which systems operate. This results in a high degree of uncertainty (low predictability) in the outcome(s)

of forcings caused by direct and indirect human activity. Moreover, climate models and analysis of Earth system dynamics during periods oxyclozanide of very rapid climate and environmental change, such as during the last deglaciation, suggest that very rapid system changes as a result of bifurcations are highly likely (Held and Kleinen, 2004, Lenton, 2011 and Lenton, 2013). This supports the viewpoint that Earth systems in the Anthropocene are likely to be increasingly nonlinear and thus are a poor fit to uniformitarian principles. We argue that understanding and modelling of Earth systems as ‘low-predictability’ systems that exhibit deterministic chaos should be a key goal of future studies.